Yelton & McLaughlin v. Department of Public Works
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
— This appeal is to determine which of two applicants, as a matter of law, is entitled to a certificate of public convenience and necessity, under the provisions of § 4, ch. Ill, Laws of 1921, p. 338; Rem. Comp. Stat., § 6387.
Prior to 1921, appellants were operating a stage line with motor propelled vehicles from Bellingham to Glacier, and tributary territory east of Glacier. Glacier is forty miles east of Bellingham. A poorly constructed road extended to the Washington forest re serve beyond Glacier, some seven miles, to a point known as the power plant.
In 1920, the Federal government and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1924
- State ex rel. B. & M. Auto Freight v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Stolting v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Kitsap County Transportation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Pacific Northwest Traction Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1929
- North Coast Transportation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Denman v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.