Legal Opinion

Yelton & McLaughlin v. Department of Public Works

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1925No. 19564. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This appeal is to determine which of two applicants, as a matter of law, is entitled to a certificate of public convenience and necessity, under the provisions of § 4, ch. Ill, Laws of 1921, p. 338; Rem. Comp. Stat., § 6387.

Prior to 1921, appellants were operating a stage line with motor propelled vehicles from Bellingham to Glacier, and tributary territory east of Glacier. Glacier is forty miles east of Bellingham. A poorly constructed road extended to the Washington forest re serve beyond Glacier, some seven miles, to a point known as the power plant.

In 1920, the Federal government and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State ex rel. B. & M. Auto Freight v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Stolting v. KuykendallWashington Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Kitsap County Transportation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Pacific Northwest Traction Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. North Coast Transportation Co. v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Denman v. Department of Public WorksWashington Supreme Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API