Legal Opinion

City of Bloomfield Hills v. Ziegelman

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 1981No. Docket 50796PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtE. E. Borradaile, J.

This case involves an architect who constructed a home on a 1.14-acre lot owned by him and his wife in the City of Bloomfield Hills and later applied for a permit to build a backyard tennis court. The city disapproved the tennis court , plans, basing its refusal on the fact that the tennis court would violate the zoning ordinance which prohibits any structure within 35 feet of the rear property line.

Defendants sought a rear yard variance but the zoning board of appeals denied the request, finding that the word "building” included the word "structure” and that a building or structure included…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. County of Delta v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Kalamazoo Police Supervisors' Ass'n v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API