City of Bloomfield Hills v. Ziegelman
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtE. E. Borradaile, J.
This case involves an architect who constructed a home on a 1.14-acre lot owned by him and his wife in the City of Bloomfield Hills and later applied for a permit to build a backyard tennis court. The city disapproved the tennis court , plans, basing its refusal on the fact that the tennis court would violate the zoning ordinance which prohibits any structure within 35 feet of the rear property line.
Defendants sought a rear yard variance but the zoning board of appeals denied the request, finding that the word "building” included the word "structure” and that a building or structure included…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Gorieb v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- County of Delta v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
- Kalamazoo Police Supervisors' Ass'n v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983