Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Nanorta

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 24, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant challenges his judgment of sentence for criminal attempt. We write to address the definition of the word “lure” in the statute entitled Luring a Child into a Motor Vehicle, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 2910. While driving his car, appellant approached a ten-year-old girl who was riding her bicycle on the street. Appellant stopped his car, opened the door, put his foot on the ground and said, “Get in my car.” The child did not obey and instead informed police about the incident. As a result, appellant faced trial for several charges. All charges except Criminal Attempt, 18 Pa.C.S.A §…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. FigueroaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. TateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Commonwealth v. TateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. HartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API