Towles Arnett v. Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
October 7, 1909. The opinion of the Court was delivered by The question presented by the exceptions is, whether his Honor, the presiding Judge, erred in ruling that even if the defendant, at the time of the contract, did not have notice of circumstances from which it might reasonably be expected that special damages would result, nevertheless the defendant would be liable for special damages, if such notice was given subsequently, and after the expiration of a reasonable time, for delivering the goods.
The general rule is, that special damages are not recoverable for the loss of goods, unless…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matheson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- McMeekin v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Kolb v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
- McKerall v. Atlantic Coast Line R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Dent v. BryceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1881
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kline Iron & Steel Co. v. Superior Trucking Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Gadsden v. Home Fertilizer & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- Walker v. QuinnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Trammell v. Eastern Air LinesDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1955
- Simons-Mayrant Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line R.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.