Legal Opinion

In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 30, 2011No. Misc. No. 2007-0489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re-Open Fact Discovery for Limited, Deposition Discovery Due To Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Production of Critical “Alliance” Meeting Documents on the Last Day of Fact Discovery and Supporting Memorandum [# 511]. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.

This is an action in which the gravamen of the plaintiffs’ complaint is that the defendants agreed to impose fuel surcharges on plaintiffs, their customers, in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  2. United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. 2910 Georgia Avenue LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Cedar Lodge Plantation, LLC v. CSHV Fairway View I, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API