In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN M. FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
Now pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Re-Open Fact Discovery for Limited, Deposition Discovery Due To Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company’s Production of Critical “Alliance” Meeting Documents on the Last Day of Fact Discovery and Supporting Memorandum [# 511]. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
This is an action in which the gravamen of the plaintiffs’ complaint is that the defendants agreed to impose fuel surcharges on plaintiffs, their customers, in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Childers v. SlaterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
3Cited by2 opinions
- 2910 Georgia Avenue LLC v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cedar Lodge Plantation, LLC v. CSHV Fairway View I, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2020