Legal Opinion

Swift Transportation Company v. Alfred Angulo, Jr.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 17, 2013No. 12-1069PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Chief Judge.

Filing this diversity action, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC (Swift) sued attorney Alfred F. Angulo, Jr. and the law firm Barrett and Deacon, P.A. (collectively, lawyers), alleging malpractice for failing to file a timely appeal of an adverse judgment in an Arkansas state court action. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to the lawyers. We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the district court did not err in granting summary judgment, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background 2

In the early morning hours…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Fudge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  4. Hinkston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Infogroup, Inc. v. DatabaseUSA.com LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  2. Bedwell v. CosseyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
  3. Brantley v. UPS Ground Freight IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019
  4. Cox v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Malcolm Phinney v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc., d/b/a R+L Carriers and Matthew DakusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API