Swift Transportation Company v. Alfred Angulo, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, Chief Judge.
Filing this diversity action, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC (Swift) sued attorney Alfred F. Angulo, Jr. and the law firm Barrett and Deacon, P.A. (collectively, lawyers), alleging malpractice for failing to file a timely appeal of an adverse judgment in an Arkansas state court action. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to the lawyers. We have appellate jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because the district court did not err in granting summary judgment, we affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Background 2
In the early morning hours…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Carmody v. Kansas City Board of Police CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Fudge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Hinkston v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Ethyl Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Infogroup, Inc. v. DatabaseUSA.com LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- Bedwell v. CosseyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2020
- Brantley v. UPS Ground Freight IncDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2019
- Cox v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Malcolm Phinney v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc., d/b/a R+L Carriers and Matthew DakusDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026