Legal Opinion

Ford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1926No. 10170PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Judge.

The offense is manslaughter, and the punishment is five years in the penitentiary.

The state’s testimony, if true, is sufficient to support the verdict. The appellant’s testimony, if true, is sufficient to clearly raise the issue of manslaughter and also clearly raise the issue of threats on the part of the deceased prior to the killing and an effort on his part to carry into execution said threats at the time thereof.

In submitting the law with reference to the threats, the court used the following language:

“If you believe from the evidence that the defendant, Frank Ford, shot and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1890
  2. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Goforth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1926
  2. House v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Anderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Shannon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API