Legal Opinion

Bernard v. S.B., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 6, 2015No. 161208924; A154386PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.

Plaintiff brought this action for intentional interference with economic relations, misrepresentation, and injunctive relief, based on allegations that defendant, her former employer, threatened to enforce an invalid noncom-petition agreement. Plaintiffs legal theories rely on her contention that her noncompetition agreement with defendant is unenforceable under ORS 653.295 because defendant failed to notify her two weeks before she started work that a noncompetition agreement would be required. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant. As explained below, we conclude…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Uptown Heights Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Seafirst Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. StamperOregon Supreme Court · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brinton Business Ventures, Inc. v. SearleDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. Juarez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Ride PDX v. Tee & B, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  4. Oregon Psychiatric Partners, LLP v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. AssuredPartners of Oregon, LLC v. ReeseDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API