Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Richardson

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 19, 1995No. A93A2221PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

In Gilbert v. Richardson, 211 Ga. App. 795 (440 SE2d 684) (1994), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendants on the grounds that they were immune to suit under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. The Supreme Court granted certiorari and affirmed in part and reversed in part our decision in Gilbert v. Richardson, 264 Ga. 744 (452 SE2d 476) (1994).

Prior to the 1991 amendment, Art. I, Sec. II, Par. IX of the 1983 Constitution provided for a waiver of sovereign immunity for any claim against “the state or any of its departments and agencies” to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Thompson v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  3. Bibb County v. HancockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1955
  4. City of Thomaston v. BridgesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. Hiers v. City of BarwickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  2. Miller v. Georgia Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Miller v. Georgia Ports AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API