Legal Opinion

Mutinelli v. Mutinelli

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1982PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stanley Harwood, J.

This motion by defendant to modify a stipulation of settlement and cross motion by plaintiff for counsel fees are respectfully referred for an evidentiary hearing to Special Term, Part V, for the reasons set out below.

This action for separation was commenced in or about November, 1980, after the effective date of the “equitable distribution” law. The parties appeared in court on January 19,1982 at which time a stipulation of settlement was spread on the record. Although no copy of the stipulation was submitted with the moving or opposing papers, a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goldman v. GoldmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Bowmer v. BowmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Vranick v. VranickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pintus v. PintusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Cohen v. SeletskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Grunfeld v. GrunfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Busetti v. BusettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Bouklas v. BouklasNew York Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API