Legal Opinion

Aschenberg v. Mundy

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 8, 1908PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On appeal from the District Court of Perth Amboy.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenohard, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in the District Court of Perth Amboy.

The action was brought to recover the balance of the contract price of a gasoline engine, and was heard by the judge, without a jury.

The appellants insist that the judgment for the plaintiffs was not justified by the evidence.

There was testimony tending to show that, by the terms of the contract, the purchase price was to be paid on “the completion of the engine;” that the engine was completed by the plaintiffs and delivered by them to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanson v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1905

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Backes v. MovsovichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911
  2. Marten v. BrownSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  3. Berger v. BermanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  4. Howard v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910
  5. Milk v. MulcaheySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API