Legal Opinion

Howard v. Moore

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 21, 1910PublishedCited by 1 opinion

On appeal from the District Court of the city of Hoboken.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Trenchard, J.

This action was brought by Franklin Howard, Jr., against Robert J. Moore, in the District Court of the city of Hoboken, to recover the sum of $377.57 alleged to be duo for wages and for moneys paid for the use of the defendant. The defence was payment.

The trial judge, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the plaintiff for $100. The defendant appeals.

The first reason assigned for reversal is that the trial judge admitted in evidence a book of account kept by the plaintiff.

We think there is no merit in the contention.

It does not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aschenberg v. MundySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mahoney v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API