Legal Opinion

Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

This is a motion pursuant to Rule 12 (b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., for judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter and of the defendants, and that the plaintiff has an adequate remedy at law.

Plaintiff is a domestic corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New York, having its principal place of business in the County of Queens, State of New York.

On May 28, 1958, plaintiff entered into a contract with United States of America to construct a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Blackmar v. GuerreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  4. Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  5. Kennedy v. Public Works AdministrationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1938

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  2. Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  3. Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1960
  4. Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API