Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, District Judge.
The plaintiff moves to remand the action to the New York Supreme Court, County of Queens, or in the alternative, to sever the two claims alleged in the complaint so that trial of the second claim may proceed. The defendants move to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
The first claim is asserted against the defendants Floete and Brennan. Floete is the Administrator of the General Services Administration; Brennan is the Chief of the Design and Construction Division, Public Buildings Service, of that federal agency. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Howard v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
- Hartline v. ClaryDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1956
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. FloeteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962