Legal Opinion

Lineberger v. State Ex Rel. Beeler

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Chambliss

This bill was filed in the name of the State ex rel. Roy H. Beeler, Attorney-General, and A. G. Ewing, et al., members of the Tennessee Bar, acting on behalf of the Bar Association of Tennessee, to enjoin J. A. Lineberger from practicing law or acting as an attorney, solicitor or counselor in any of the courts of this State, alleging that he has not taken the examination provided by law before the State Board of Law Examiners, and has not received a license to practice law as required by Section 7113a of the 1932 Code, and has not complied in other respects with the pertinent Code provisions.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stratton v. MorrisTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. State v. Columbia, Godwin & Santa Fe Turnpike Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Lamb v. WhitakerTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Howe v. Hawkins CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barr v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Eye Clinic, P.C. v. Jackson-Madison County General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Board of Dental Examiners v. AllenTennessee Supreme Court · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API