Legal Opinion

Mack v. Latta

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, John M. Hack, from three interlocutory judgments of the Supreme Court in favor of the several defendants, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of ¡New York, respectively, on the 6th, 16th and 18th days of June, 1902, upon decisions of the court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, sustaining the several demurrers of the defendants to the plaintiff’s complaint.

1Opinion of the Court

Ingraham, J.:

The defendants severally demur to the complaint, the demurrers being based upon two grounds, first, that causes of action have been improperly united, and, second, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendant. The Special Term tiled a separate decision upon each of the demurrers sustaining the same upon the grounds that causes of action had been improperly united, and that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the demurring defendant. From the interlocutory…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tew v. . WolfsohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Higgins v. . CrichtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Higgins v. CrichtonNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Munson v. FishburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Montalvo v. Florence N. Sobel, Inc. (In Re Florence N. Sobel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  3. Rose v. Merchants' Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API