Christine Blanda v. Martin & Seibert, LC
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
FILED No. 19-0317 – Blanda v. Martin & Seibert November 22, 2019 released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK WORKMAN, J., dissenting: SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA “The most frequently used exception to at-will employment, a wrongful discharge claim that alleges the termination violated public policy, seeks to balance the employer’s interest in operating a business efficiently and profitably, the employee’s interest in earning a livelihood, and society’s interest in seeing its public policies carried out.”1 In light of the egregious facts pled here, this Court should have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Harless v. First National Bank in FairmontWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Palmer v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988
- Wholey v. RoebuckCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Cordle v. General Hugh Mercer Corp.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.