Legal Opinion
Cordell v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 08ap-749 (3-31-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided March 31, 2009No. 08AP-749PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Phillip K. Cordell ("appellant"), appeals from the judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio in favor of defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction ("ODRC"), on appellant's negligence claim arising from appellant's fall from a curb while being transported on the grounds of Madison Correctional Institution ("MaCI"). Because the judgment of the Court of Claims is supported by competent, credible evidence, we affirm.
{¶ 2} On August 29, 2005, at approximately 4:45 a.m., appellant, an inmate at MaCI was being led by corrections officers…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jenkins v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Harris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Donaldson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024
- Lamtman v. WardOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Lloyd v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.