Lloyd v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtTyack, P.J.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Damon Lloyd, appeals a judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio in favor of defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction. Because the open and obvious doctrine does not apply and because the trial court should have engaged in a comparative-fault analysis, we reverse.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
{¶ 2} Appellant is an inmate in the custody and control of appellee at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution ("CCI"). On February 19, 2014, appellant injured his right hand while adjusting the height of a window in the F-2 dormitory at CCI. There…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Jenkins v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- McElfresh v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr., Unpublished Decision (10-19-2004)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Flagstar Bank, F.S.B. v. Airline Union's Mortgage Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- Woods v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Feathers v. Ohio Dept. Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
- Lloyd v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Claims · 2017
- Lloyd v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017