Legal Opinion

Effie Ann Romane v. Defense Contract Audit Agency

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 26, 1985No. Appeal 85-512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BISSELL, Circuit Judge.

The decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board), Docket Number AT531D8410142, 22 M.S.P.R. 656 (1984), affirming the reconsideration decision of the Defense Contract Audit Agency which had sustained the denial of a within-grade pay increase for Effie Ann Romane is affirmed.

BACKGROUND

Romane has been employed as a Clerk (Typist) in the Atlanta Branch Office of the Defense Contract Audit Agency (agency) since the fall of 1979. In March 1981, she was promoted to GS-4 and in April 1982, to GS-5. As a GS-4 and GS-5, her position, although labeled as Clerk (Typist),…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
  2. Brenda White v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  3. Wilson C. Schramm v. Department of Health and Human Services, Merit Systems Protection Board, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  4. Meyer v. Department of Health & Human Services, Social Security AdministrationUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Ayub K. Ommaya v. National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peter Espenschied v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  2. Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United States Customs ServiceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
  3. Ahuruonye v. Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API