Legal Opinion
Manansingh v. United States
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 31, 2024No. 2:20-cv-01139Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA CHANDAN MANANSINGH and Case No. 2:20-cv-01139-DWM ANGELA NAIRNS, Plaintiffs, ORDER VS. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. In June 2020, Plaintiffs Chandan Manansingh and Angela Nairns (collectively “Plaintiffs”) sued the United States and five federal probation officers, alleging constitutional claims under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971), and state tort claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), based on a probationary search of their residence and Manansingh’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Deborah Wood v. Gcc Bend, Llc, an Oregon Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Lorna Kreines v. United States of America, and Jack McMenimen Wayne YamashitaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.