Commonwealth v. Sheehy
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtLiacos, C.J.
Once again, we review a trial in which alternate jurors were present in the jury room during deliberations. In Commonwealth v. Smith, 403 Mass. 489 (1988), and again in Commonwealth v. Jones, 405 Mass. 661 (1989), we held that it is reversible error to allow alternate jurors to sit in the jury room with deliberating jurors. We reaffirm the Smith rule in the present case.
The record before us presents these facts. The defendant, Paul Sheehy, was indicted for murder on August 7, 1986, see G. L. c. 265, § 1 (1990 ed.), and was tried in the Superior Court from September 8 to September 24, 1987.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Woodward v. LeavittMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Commonwealth v. FidlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Commonwealth v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Sears v. Treasurer & Receiver GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
- State v. CuzickWashington Supreme Court · 1975
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Commonwealth v. MubdiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- Commonwealth v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. AliceaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.