Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Young

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2001No. NonePublished

1DissentGilbertson, Justice

[¶ 16.] I respectfully dissent. SDCL 32-22-55 and SDCL 32-22-56, when construed together, double the ordinary statutory penalty for various types of an overweight vehicle. As such I would reverse the circuit court.

[¶ 17.] This is a case of statutory construction. Statutory intent must be construed from the statute as a whole as well as other statutes relating to the same subject. US West Communications v. PUC, 505 N.W.2d 115, 123 (S.D.1993). In reviewing SDCL chapter 32-22, it is clear that the intent of the Legislature is to reduce damage to the highways of South Dakota. “The evil sought to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. US West Communications, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. FeiokSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Matter of Estate of WolffSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1971
  5. State v. BozeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API