Legal Opinion

United States v. Garrett Door, Sr.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 19, 2016No. 15-30159Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Garrett Dean Door, Sr., appeals his convictions following a jury trial. At trial, the government offered evidence from seven witnesses, including the victim Jane Doe and M.H., the survivor of a 2009 misdemeanor sexual assault to which Door pled nolo contendere. 1 Door argues that M.H.’s testimony about the 2009 sexual assault should not have been admitted under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 403. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

We review de novo both the district court’s interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, United States v. Urena, 659 F.3d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Fred James Lemay, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. UrenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. GarridoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Julie Ann Blind-Doan v. Bron Sanders, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API