United States v. Garrett Door, Sr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Garrett Dean Door, Sr., appeals his convictions following a jury trial. At trial, the government offered evidence from seven witnesses, including the victim Jane Doe and M.H., the survivor of a 2009 misdemeanor sexual assault to which Door pled nolo contendere. 1 Door argues that M.H.’s testimony about the 2009 sexual assault should not have been admitted under Federal Rules of Evidence 413 and 403. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
We review de novo both the district court’s interpretation of the Federal Rules of Evidence, United States v. Urena, 659 F.3d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Fred James Lemay, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. RedlightningCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. UrenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. GarridoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Julie Ann Blind-Doan v. Bron Sanders, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.