(PC) Haapaniemi v. Warden, FCI Mendota Prison
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BJORN ERIK HAAPANIEMI, 1:23-cv-00306-GSA-PC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND 13 vs. (ECF No. 6.) 14 WARDEN, FCI MENDOTA PRISON, ORDER INFORMING PLAINTIFF HE HAS LEAVE TO AMEND THE 15 et al., COMPLAINT ONCE AS A MATTER OF COURSE 16 Defendants. DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST 17 AMENDED COMPLAINT ON COURT’S FORM: MAY 5, 2023 18 ORDER FOR CLERK TO SEND 19 COMPLAINT FORM TO PLAINTIFF 20 21 22 23 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Bjorn Erik Haapaniemi (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- George v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Johnson v. DuffyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- May v. EnomotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.