Legal Opinion
Brink's Inc. v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1982No. 80 Civ. 6975PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
Brink’s Inc. (“Brink’s”) moves for summary judgment on the • counterclaims of third-party defendant William J. Donovan for intentional infliction of emotional distress and wrongful discharge on the grounds that there is no genuine issue of material fact concerning such claims and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Donovan has not submitted the required Rule 3(g) statement, nor any other response papers to the motion; consequently, all “the material facts set forth in [Brink’s 3(g) statement] will be deemed to be admitted.” 1
Donovan…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- ATI, Inc. v. Ruder & Finn, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Parker v. BorockNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Chin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.New York Supreme Court · 1978
- Savodnik v. Korvettes, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1980
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lapsley v. Columbia University-College of Physicians & SurgeonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Bradley v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Hunnewell v. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Wrenn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Lapidus v. New York City Chapter of New York State Ass'n for Retarded Children, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.