Borman v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. , ' Jacob A. Borman and another were convicted under Criminal Code, §§ 36, 37, of conspiring to apply to their own use property of the United States, and of conspiring to sell, convey, and dispose of such property, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error (hereinafter called defendants) have been convicted upon an indictment which in the first count charged them with having unlawfully conspired to apply to their own use certain property of the United States, and in the second count charged that they unlawfully conspired to sell, convey, and dispose of the same property. The indictment is based on the following provisions of the Criminal Code (Act March 4, 1909, c. 321, 35 S'tat. 1096 [Comp. St. §§ 10200, 10201]):
“Sec. 36. Whoever shall steal, embezzle, or knowingly apply to his own use, or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hatch v. Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Powder Co. v. BurkhardtSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- In re LiebigCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
- Mills v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cota v. Porven, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 2021