Legal Opinion

Cota v. Porven, Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 20, 2021No. 3:20-cv-01806Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULISSA COTA, individually and on Case No. 20-cv-01806-BAS-RBB 11 behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 12 Plaintiff, DISMISS COUNT II OF PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT 13 v. (ECF No. 7) 14 PORVEN, LTD., d/b/a/ PORCELANOSA USA, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter 18 jurisdiction Plaintiff’s state-law claim (Count II). (Mot., ECF No. 7; Mem., ECF No. 7-1.) 19 Plaintiff opposes (Opp’n, ECF No. 10) and Defendant replies (Reply, ECF No.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. Schutza v. CuddebackDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
  4. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Douglas Leite v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API