Legal Opinion

Wiren v. Shubert Theatre Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 24, 1933PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODDARD, District Judge.

This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the bill of complaint upon the ground that it does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and particularly that it affirmatively appears from a reading of the complainant’s play “Most” and the, complainant’s translation of “La Morte in Vaeanze” or “Death Takes a Holiday,” both of which are annexed to the complaint, that there is no plagiarism of the complainant’s ■work.

The suit was begun by the service of the bill of complaint upon the defendants in May, 1931. It is brought to enjoin the defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  2. Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  3. King Features Syndicate v. FleischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  4. United States v. 20 Strings Seed PearlsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  5. Lowenfels v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  3. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  4. Echevarria v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1935
  5. Wiren v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API