Wiren v. Shubert Theatre Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
GODDARD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the defendants to dismiss the bill of complaint upon the ground that it does not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and particularly that it affirmatively appears from a reading of the complainant’s play “Most” and the, complainant’s translation of “La Morte in Vaeanze” or “Death Takes a Holiday,” both of which are annexed to the complaint, that there is no plagiarism of the complainant’s ■work.
The suit was begun by the service of the bill of complaint upon the defendants in May, 1931. It is brought to enjoin the defendants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- King Features Syndicate v. FleischerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- United States v. 20 Strings Seed PearlsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Lowenfels v. NathanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peter F. Gaito Architecture, LLC v. Simone Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Greenbie v. NobleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
- Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
- Echevarria v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1935
- Wiren v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.