Legal Opinion
Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. Allen
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1898No. 556PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United Stales for the Western Division of the Noi them District of Ohio.
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court of the Northern district of Ohio refusing to grant a preliminary injunction on a bill filed by the Societe Anonyme Du Filtre *816Obamberland Systeme Pasteur and the Pasteur Ckamberland Filter Company against Mortimer H. Allen and the Allen Manufacturing Company, to enjoin the infringement of letters patent No. 336,385, granted to Charles E. Chamberland for a filtering compound. 84 Fed. 812. The invention is described by the patentee in his specifications as follows:
“The means liitlierto employed lor filtering water…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blount v. Societe Anonyme Du Filtre Chamberland Systeme PasteurCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1892
- Societe Anonyme du Filtre Chamberland Systeme Pasteur v. AllenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Love v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1911
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. Midland Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
- Fisher v. Travelers' Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- American Grain Separator Co. v. Twin City Separator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912
- Meiselman v. Paramount Film Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.