Legal Opinion

Com. of Pa. v. Heiland

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1934No. Appeal 258PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

The Commonwealth has appealed from an order of the court below directing the district attorney of Som erset County to return to their owner, L. G-. Heiland, seven slot machines, seized as gambling devices.

The record before us is somewhat confused through the improper intermingling of proceedings against the machines, themselves, under Section 60 of the Penal Code of March 31, 1860, P. L. 382, 398, 18 PS §1445, with criminal prosecutions against their owner, and the persons to whom he distributed them, under Section 55 of the Code, P. L. 397, 18 PS §1441, (as amended…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of Supt. of PoliceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Commonwealth of Pa. v. HeilandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlytheSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Commonwealth v. PetrilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Commonwealth v. Spisak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1974
  4. Gazo AppealCarbon County Court of Quarter Sessions · 1962
  5. Commonwealth v. StahlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API