Legal Opinion

Pigg v. MASSAGEE

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 2009No. COA08-1270Published

1Per curiam

Larry W. Pigg and his wife, Gloria Vandiver, (together, “plaintiffs”) appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure for relief from judgment in a collateral matter. Boyd B. Massagee, Jr. (“defendant”) and the partnership, Prince, Youngblood & Massagee, (collectively, “defendants”) have moved this Court to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal and to enter sanctions against plaintiffs. Plaintiffs also have moved this Court to grant sanctions against defendants. For the reasons set forth below, we deny plaintiffs’ motion, grant…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Goldston v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Jeffreys v. Raleigh Oaks Joint VentureCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  4. Harris v. MatthewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Johnson v. LucasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API