Legal Opinion
United States v. Pritchette
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 9, 2016No. 16cr331PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge:
Defendant Tony Pritehette moves to suppress statements obtained during post-arrest interrogations in April and May *3822016. Pritchette’s motion to suppress is granted.
BACKGROUND
Tony Pritchette is charged in a one-count indictment with Hobbs Act robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 1951, in connection with a March 2016 air-rifle robbery of a Me-troPCS store in the Bronx. Detective Cesar Castillo led the investigation and was supervised by Sergeant Michael LoPuzzo. (Sept. 20, 2016 Suppression Hearing Tr. (“Tr.”), at 3:16-18, 12:3-4.) To help with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. BayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. HarunDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017