Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. Sidney Blumenthal & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 4, 1938No. 333PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The three patents in suit relate (1) Gibbons to the process of manufacturing vulcanized rubber compositions, (2) Hopkinson to the coating of various fibrous materials with latex compositions, and (3) Foster & Cook to the application to needled pile fabric of latex compositions such as those described by Gibbons and Hopkinson.

Gibbons Patent No. 1,654,167.

The patent to Gibbons is particularly for a process of vulcanization where the vulcanizing ingredient or agent is combined with Latex. Gibbons’ only claim reads as follows: “Process of manufacturing vulcanized…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Vultex Corp. of America v. Heveatex Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Jewel Incandescent Lamp Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1942
  2. Ludlow Manufacturing & Sales Co. v. Dolphin Jute Mills, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1943
  3. East Rutherford Syringes, Inc. v. Omega Precision Medical Instrument Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
  4. Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API