Legal Opinion
East Rutherford Syringes, Inc. v. Omega Precision Medical Instrument Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 26, 1957No. Civ. Nos. 903, 1090PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, District Judge.
These are civil actions under the patent laws, and more particularly Section 281 of Title 35 U.S.C.A., for the infringement of claims 3 and 6 of Patent No. 2,505,411, issued on the application of Samuel Kolodny and Nicholas Micci, who, prior to the issuance thereof, assigned all right, title and interest therein to the plaintiff. The actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial.
The claims in suit cover and define a hypodermic syringe of the barrel and plunger type, a type in common use prior to the patent, but are directed particularly to an improvement…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Davis-Bournonville Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Paramount Publix Corp. v. American Triergon Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Lovell Manufacturing Co. v. CarySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Old Town Ribbon & Carbon Co. v. Columbia Ribbon & Carbon Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Celite Corporation v. Dicalite Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Messing v. Quiltmaster CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Entron of Maryland, Inc. v. Jerrold Electronics Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1960
- Messing v. Quiltmaster Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- Beck v. WatsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1958