Legal Opinion

Neal v. Van Winkle

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1884PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts of the case are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Snyder, Judge:

In April, 1883, Joseph B. Heal, as administrator, with the will annexed, of Paul Cook, deceased, brought this suit in in the circuit court of Wood county against the devisees and legatees of his testator, Benjamin Chancellor and others. The bill, after setting out the will of said Cook and the codicils thereto, aud the conflicting constructions alleged to have been given thereto, avers that the plaintiff by reason of these conflicting claims is entitled to have the aid of the court to interpret said will and determine the rights of the claimants thereunder.

The defendants, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rymer v. HawkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. King v. BurdettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oney v. ClendeninWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Bloss v. HullWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Greathouse v. SappWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Love v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Aspinall v. BarrickmanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1887

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API