Kirby v. Board of Adjustment of Raleigh
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Carter excepts to the trial court’s conclusion of law that “[t]he action of the Raleigh Board of Adjustment in granting a variance *184in the matter under review before this Court was contrary to law.” We affirm the trial court.
N.C.G.S. § 160A-381 enables cities to regulate and restrict land use:
For the purpose of promoting health, safety, morals, or the general welfare of the community, any city may regulate and restrict the height, number of stories and size of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lots that may be occupied, the size of yards, courts and other open…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. Board of AldermenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Fisher v. Town of BoscawenSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Bennett v. City of ClemsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987