Legal Opinion
Hawley, Et Ux. v. Kendall, Et Ux.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChapman, J.
The record in this case shows that prior to October 18, 1935, Charles Edason was the owner of certain real estate situated in the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, and reached terms and an agreement to convey the property to J. D. Kendall for the sum of $1,500.00. While Mr. J. D. Kendall did not have the money to pay for the property, he arranged to obtain it from J. A. Hawley. On the 18th day of October, 1935, Mr. Hawley sent his attorney to the home of Mr. Charles Edason, some few miles out from the City of Fort Pierce, and accompanying him was Mr. Kendall and another attorney. It appears that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Travis v. TravisSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- Hill v. BeachamSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
- Simpson v. First National Bank of PensacolaSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Chandler and Chandler v. KendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
- Commercial Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peterson v. HancockSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
- Dillon v. J. W. Walter, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957