Legal Opinion
Medical Protective Co. v. Pang
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 19, 2010No. CV 05-2924-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES A. TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant Dr. Herman Pang’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 264); Plaintiff Medical Protective Company’s Motion for Rule 60(b) Relief (Doe. 266); Plaintiffs Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Under Rule 59(e) (Doc. 268); Plaintiffs Motion to Strike and Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Doc. 269); Defendant’s Rule Motion Requesting Review and Revision of Clerk’s 4/28/10 Order Re: Taxation of Costs (Doc. 273); Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Supplement (Doc. 285); Defendant’s Second Motion for Extension of Time to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Charles E. McDowell Jr. v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Marvin Kagan v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Howard Turner Mary Turner Bill Oskowski Marisa Oskowski v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Medical Protective Company v. Herman PangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Medical Protective Co. v. PangDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2014