Legal Opinion

Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Boykin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BeogdeN; J.

Two propositions of law are presented by the record, as follows:,

1. Can Thomas H. Boykin show by parol evidence that he signed the $14,090.00 note to Bailey Banking Co. as surety for his brother, A. H. Boykin ?

2. Does Thomas H. Boykin lose his right of subrogation by reason of cancellation of the mortgage securing the $14,090.00 note?

In determining the merits of the first proposition the general rule is that in the hands of an original payee an endorsement may be shown to be upon certain conditions; but a bona fide holder for value before maturity and without notice is not affected…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Southerland v. . FremontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Wayman v. CochraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Gillam v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Saieed v. . AbeyounisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Tarboro v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  4. Howell v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  5. State Planters Bank v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API