Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. Boykin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BeogdeN; J.
Two propositions of law are presented by the record, as follows:,
1. Can Thomas H. Boykin show by parol evidence that he signed the $14,090.00 note to Bailey Banking Co. as surety for his brother, A. H. Boykin ?
2. Does Thomas H. Boykin lose his right of subrogation by reason of cancellation of the mortgage securing the $14,090.00 note?
In determining the merits of the first proposition the general rule is that in the hands of an original payee an endorsement may be shown to be upon certain conditions; but a bona fide holder for value before maturity and without notice is not affected…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Liles v. . RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Sykes v. EverettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Southerland v. . FremontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Wayman v. CochraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Gillam v. . WalkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Saieed v. . AbeyounisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Farmers Co-Operative Fertilizer Co. v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Tarboro v. . ForbesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Howell v. . RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- State Planters Bank v. Courtesy Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.