Legal Opinion

Saieed v. . Abeyounis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWinborne, J.

These questions present in the main the points for decision on this appeal:

1. Where judgment is rendered on a debt evidenced by note for which judgment debtors — two as principals and one as surety — are liable, is paid in part with money advanced for tbe purpose by the surety and is canceled without assignment pro tanto to a trustee for his benefit as provided by statute, Public Laws 1919, ch. 194; C. S., 618, may the surety maintain an action against principals for recovery of money advanced ?

2. If so, will a payment made by one of the principals to surety in partial reimbursement for…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Green v. Greensboro Female CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Battle v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. Cashmar-King Supply Co. v. Dowd & KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  4. Hewlett v. . SchenckSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Wood v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. BookerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. LaVecchia v. North Carolina Joint Stock Land Bank of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Oliver v. . OliverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. McGowan v. BeachSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API