Legal Opinion
Devines v. Maier
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 23, 1981No. 80-2315PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs in this class action are residents of Milwaukee who were required by the City to vacate their rented homes as a result of the City’s enforcement of its housing code. Plaintiffs contend that they are entitled to compensation for their displace- ■ ments from their residences pursuant to the just compensation clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; Wisconsin’s eminent domain statute, Wis.Stats. § 32.19; and the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act (URA), 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.1 Defendants…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- James N. Barbian and Joan L. Barbian v. Constantine Panagis and the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Housing Authority v. LamotheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Delores Devines, Cross-Appellants v. Henry W. Maier, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- In re GiffordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Heir v. Delaware River Port AuthorityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.