Wm. B. Tenny, Etc. v. Dauphin Deposit Bk.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
HOFFMAN, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order granting summary judgment because the applicable statutes of limitations had expired. For the following reasons, we affirm as to counts two and three of appellant’s complaint, but reverse and remand as to count one.
I
Summary judgment “shall be rendered if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Pa.R. Civ.P. 1035(b). The evidence must be…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Schaffer v. LarzelereSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. WallerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- A. J. Aberman, Inc. v. Funk Building Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Moore v. McComseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Greenberg v. TomlinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Wilson v. Central Penn Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Bednar v. MarinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hartleb v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.