Legal Opinion
CONVERY v. MCGINLEY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 27, 2023No. 5:22-cv-02346Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT CONVERY, JR. : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 22-2346 : TOM MCGINLEY, THE DISTRICT : ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF : BERKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL : OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA : MEMORANDUM MURPHY, J. November 27, 2023 Robert Convery, Jr. objects to Magistrate Judge Sitarski’s recommendation that we deny his petition for writ of habeas corpus. He argues that Judge Sitarski erred in concluding that Mr. Convery’s attorney for his criminal trial provided him effective assistance of counsel. Based on our thorough review of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Wood v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.