Hill v. Town
Michigan Supreme Court
Case-made from Eaton; Smith, J. Information in the nature of quo warranto by Calvin H. Hill and others against Frank P. Town and others to determine the right of respondents to the office of directors of a corporation. A judgment confirming respondents’ title to the office is reviewed by relators on case-made.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
In the circuit court for the county of Eaton, relators, on October 5, 1911, asked and were given leave to file an information in the nature of a quo warranto against respondents to determine by what right they assumed to act as directors of the Duplex-Power Car Company, a Michigan corporation, relators claiming that they were the lawful directors of such corporation, and that respondents unlawfully assumed such rights and authority as directors, and unlawfully used, held, and retained the factory, offices, and all the personal property of said corporation. A demurrer to this information was…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Election of Directors of the Rapid Transit Ferry Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Ellsworth Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. FaunceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1887
- Star Line of Steamers v. Van VlietMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- In re the Election of Directors of The Rapid Transit Ferry Co.New York Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by10 opinions
- Toles v. Duplex Power Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Bollstrom v. Duplex Power Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Orloff v. StottMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Garber v. TownMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Morton v. TalmadgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.