Legal Opinion

(PC) Johnson v. Unknown FBI Agents

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 9, 2024No. 2:23-cv-02622Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEVIN B. JOHNSON, No. 2:23-cv-02622 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 UNKNOWN FBI AGENTS, 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff Kevin B. Johnson proceeds without counsel and seeks relief for alleged violations 19 of his rights by unknown FBI agents. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 20 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) is before the court 21 for screening. (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API