Legal Opinion

Phelps v. Piper

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1896No. 8040PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Original action involving tlie duty of tlie secretary of state in certifying nominations for state offices under .tlie provisions of the Australian ballot law.

1Opinion of the Court

Ragan, C.

This action concerns the duty of the secretary of state in certifying nominations for state offices under the provisions of chapter 24, Session Laws, 1891, commonly known as the “Australian Ballot Law.” It was presented shortly before the last general election and its exigencies required an immediate decision, which was then rendered. Subsequently the parties withdrew the record for the purpose of making certain formal amendments to the pleadings, so that the preparation of an opinion has been necessarily delayed. Notwithstanding the manner in which the parties have entitled the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Eaton v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. State ex rel. Sturdevant v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Shields v. JacobMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Walls v. BrundidgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. Mitchell v. AldrichSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. County CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. State ex rel. Howells v. MetcalfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API