Legal Opinion
Coniglio v. Holley
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided October 26, 1965No. Civ. No. 65-C-2016-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, District Judge.
This is a ruling on a motion to quash service of process. The motion is in three paragraphs. Paragraphs 2 and 3 state that the Third-Party Defendant was not properly served under Section 496A or Section 617.3 of the Iowa Code. The Third-Party Plaintiff does not contend that service was made under either of these two sections and they will not be discussed. Paragraph 1 of Third-Party Defendant’s motion states generally that the Third-Party Defendant is not amenable to service of process in Iowa in this case.
The Third-Party Plaintiff, Holley, served the Third-Party…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. SzukhentSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cle-Ware Industries, Inc. of Puerto Rico v. Harte & Co.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1969