Legal Opinion
KAMDEN-OUAFFO v. SPATARO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 8, 2022No. 1:22-cv-03285Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY RICKY KAMDEM-OUAFFO d/b/a KAMDEM GROUP, No. 1:22-cv-03285-NLH-SAK Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. AMBER M. SPATARO, et al., Defendants. HILLMAN, District Judge WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, Plaintiff Ricky Kamdem-Ouaffo (“Plaintiff”) filed a “COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO LOCAL CIVIL RULE 104.1(d) AGAINST DEFENDANTS’ ATTORNEYS,” while referencing previously docketed matters Nos. 17-cv-07506, 18-cv-00298, and 18-cv-13119, (ECF 1); and WHEREAS, on July 28, 2022, Plaintiff filed a 135-page Amended Complaint in which the original Local Civil Rule 104.1(d)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Theodore C. Swartz v. Kpmg Llp, and Presidio Advisory Services Inc. Deutsche Bank Ag Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- John Doe v. Princeton UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Alabama Power Co. v. IckesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.