Legal Opinion

Bush v. Cincinnati Traction Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 3, 1912No. 2,148PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western Division of the Southern District of Ohio. Action by John Bush against the Cincinnati Traction Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error brought suit on account of personal injuries incurred while employed by the defendant as a lineman. The accident causing the injuries happened in September, 1907, and in this way: The crew to which plaintiff belonged was engaged in putting in new cross or span wires supporting defendant’s trolley and other wires belonging to its street railway system on Seventh street in Cincinnati. A new span wire had just been placed in position, being attached at either end to bolts inserted in the brick walls of buildings on opposite sides of the street, and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Richmond & Danville Railroad v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Carnegie Steel Co. v. ByersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  3. McKenna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. HeimlichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904
  5. Britton v. Central Union Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HickmanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1918
  2. Jupollo Public Service Co. v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
  3. James Griffith & Sons Co. v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
  4. Earles v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1921
  5. Woodruff v. Yazoo & M. V. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API